Material investment
Rank by different indicators
Filter per region
Module 2, “Material investment”, assesses actions to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions from the company’s assets and operations. Comparing the company’s trend in past and projected scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity with its 1.5°C pathway provides a good measure of its transition progress. Comparing capital expenditure (CAPEX) allocated to low-carbon technologies against the total CAPEX provides an indication of future emissions reductions, while locked-in emissions from the company’s assets show the amount by which the company is likely to exceed its carbon budget.
Ranking overview
|
|||
|
1
Ørsted
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
3
Enel
|
|
||
|
|||
|
5
E.ON
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
8
SSE
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
12
AboitizPower
|
|
||
|
13
ENGIE
|
|
||
|
14
Vistra
|
|
||
|
15
Power Assets
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
18
J Power
|
|
||
|
-
RWE
|
|
||
|
20
AES
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
27
Iberdrola
|
|
||
|
|||
|
29
JSW Energy
|
|
||
|
30
Fortum
|
|
||
|
31
Tata Power
|
|
||
|
32
ČEZ Group
|
|
||
|
33
K-Electric
|
|
||
|
|||
|
35
Uniper
|
|
||
|
36
CLP Group
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
39
PPL
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
48
Inter RAO
|
|
||
|
49
Taipower
|
|
||
|
50
NRG Energy
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
53
Duke Energy
|
|
||
|
54
NTPC
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
57
AGL Energy
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
61
Eskom
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
64
China Datang
|
|
||
|
65
Eletrobras
|
|
||
|
66
CHN Energy
|
|
||
|
|||
|