Ecosystem conversion and restoration
No evidence was found regarding the company’s efforts to avoid ecosystem conversion, including deforestation, or promote restoration. The company has an opportunity to develop a strategy and publicly report on specific, time-bound targets.
GHG emissions
The company should set time-bound targets to reduce its scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions as well as report progress against them. Crucially, the company needs to reduce its scope 1,2 and 3 emissions and its targets need to align with a 1.5-degree trajectory.
Impact and dependencies assessment
The company has not holistically assessed its impacts or how it depends on nature, including biodiversity. It has an opportunity to start such an assessment across its value chains, focused on quantification of its impacts or dependencies.
Invasive species
No evidence was found that the company identifies the activities that could lead to the introduction of IAS in its own operations. No evidence was found that the company identifies the activities that could lead to the introduction of IAS in its value chain.
Key areas and species
The company does not disclose key species or areas important for biodiversity affected by its operations or suppliers. It has an opportunity to increase its transparency.
Resource exploitation and circularity performance
No evidence was found regarding the company’s efforts to work towards a circular economy or which organisms it exploits. The company has an opportunity to develop a strategy and publicly report on specific, time-bound targets.
Solid and air pollution
The company is not reducing the production of hazardous waste. It has an opportunity to disclose quantitative evidence regarding plastic use reduction and the use of sustainable packaging. The company does not report on the amount of plastic waste generated or the proportions directed to or diverted from disposal. Additionally, the company does not report time-bound targets to reduce air pollutants across the most material parts of its value chain.
Water
No quantitative evidence was found of reductions in water withdrawal across the company’s own operations. While the company has a target to reduce water withdrawal, the target is intensity based and does not necessarily result in an absolute reduction of water withdrawal. The company does not report how much water is withdrawn for its own operations in water-stressed areas. The company does not engage with suppliers to reduce water withdrawal. The company does not regularly report on water pollution metrics, nor targets to reduce water pollution. The company has an opportunity to publicly commit to the right to water and to provide its processes for implementing preventive and corrective action plans for identified specific risks to the right to water and sanitation in its own operations.
