You are viewing an archived page. For the latest information, please visit our new website.

Click here

Traceability

Rank per measurement area

Total score Governance and strategy Ecosystems Traceability Social responsibility

Filter per region

This measurement area addresses how seafood companies commit to and implement robust traceability systems and mitigate risks of illegal, unreported and unregulated fisheries. It also assesses whether companies are transparent about the source of their seafood products and fishing activities.

Ranking overview

30 companies

Total score out of 100 Governance and strategy out of 10 Ecosystems out of 35 Traceability out of 15 Social responsibility out of 40
1 Nueva Pescanova
Total score 43.8 /100
Governance and strategy 6.1 /10
Ecosystems 16.6 /35
Traceability 9.4 /15
Social responsibility 11.8 /40
Governance and strategy 6.1 /10
Ecosystems 16.6 /35
Traceability 9.4 /15
Social responsibility 11.8 /40
- Nutreco (Skretting)
Total score 41.3 /100
Governance and strategy 4.6 /10
Ecosystems 19.0 /35
Traceability 9.4 /15
Social responsibility 8.3 /40
Governance and strategy 4.6 /10
Ecosystems 19.0 /35
Traceability 9.4 /15
Social responsibility 8.3 /40
3 Bolton Group
Total score 40.1 /100
Governance and strategy 3.8 /10
Ecosystems 16.8 /35
Traceability 8.4 /15
Social responsibility 11.0 /40
Governance and strategy 3.8 /10
Ecosystems 16.8 /35
Traceability 8.4 /15
Social responsibility 11.0 /40
- Nomad Foods
Total score 43.5 /100
Governance and strategy 4.1 /10
Ecosystems 22.3 /35
Traceability 8.4 /15
Social responsibility 8.7 /40
Governance and strategy 4.1 /10
Ecosystems 22.3 /35
Traceability 8.4 /15
Social responsibility 8.7 /40
- Thai Union Group
Total score 47.5 /100
Governance and strategy 5.8 /10
Ecosystems 14.6 /35
Traceability 8.4 /15
Social responsibility 18.6 /40
Governance and strategy 5.8 /10
Ecosystems 14.6 /35
Traceability 8.4 /15
Social responsibility 18.6 /40
6 Cargill
Total score 42.0 /100
Governance and strategy 3.6 /10
Ecosystems 19.9 /35
Traceability 7.5 /15
Social responsibility 10.9 /40
Governance and strategy 3.6 /10
Ecosystems 19.9 /35
Traceability 7.5 /15
Social responsibility 10.9 /40
7 FCF Co., Ltd.
Total score 24.5 /100
Governance and strategy 4.9 /10
Ecosystems 6.6 /35
Traceability 6.6 /15
Social responsibility 6.5 /40
Governance and strategy 4.9 /10
Ecosystems 6.6 /35
Traceability 6.6 /15
Social responsibility 6.5 /40
- Trident Seafoods
Total score 33.9 /100
Governance and strategy 1.0 /10
Ecosystems 21.9 /35
Traceability 6.6 /15
Social responsibility 4.5 /40
Governance and strategy 1.0 /10
Ecosystems 21.9 /35
Traceability 6.6 /15
Social responsibility 4.5 /40
8 Labeyrie Fine Foods
Total score 30.2 /100
Governance and strategy 3.1 /10
Ecosystems 16.2 /35
Traceability 5.6 /15
Social responsibility 5.3 /40
Governance and strategy 3.1 /10
Ecosystems 16.2 /35
Traceability 5.6 /15
Social responsibility 5.3 /40
- Mowi
Total score 43.0 /100
Governance and strategy 4.6 /10
Ecosystems 19.9 /35
Traceability 5.6 /15
Social responsibility 12.8 /40
Governance and strategy 4.6 /10
Ecosystems 19.9 /35
Traceability 5.6 /15
Social responsibility 12.8 /40
- Royal Greenland
Total score 28.1 /100
Governance and strategy 2.5 /10
Ecosystems 13.6 /35
Traceability 5.6 /15
Social responsibility 6.4 /40
Governance and strategy 2.5 /10
Ecosystems 13.6 /35
Traceability 5.6 /15
Social responsibility 6.4 /40
11 Parlevliet & Van der Plas
Total score 24.7 /100
Governance and strategy 3.5 /10
Ecosystems 10.3 /35
Traceability 4.7 /15
Social responsibility 6.3 /40
Governance and strategy 3.5 /10
Ecosystems 10.3 /35
Traceability 4.7 /15
Social responsibility 6.3 /40
12 Austevoll Seafood
Total score 26.6 /100
Governance and strategy 3.4 /10
Ecosystems 11.7 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 7.8 /40
Governance and strategy 3.4 /10
Ecosystems 11.7 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 7.8 /40
- BioMar
Total score 27.2 /100
Governance and strategy 2.4 /10
Ecosystems 9.8 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 11.3 /40
Governance and strategy 2.4 /10
Ecosystems 9.8 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 11.3 /40
- High Liner Foods
Total score 18.1 /100
Governance and strategy 2.5 /10
Ecosystems 7.4 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 4.4 /40
Governance and strategy 2.5 /10
Ecosystems 7.4 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 4.4 /40
- Nippon Suisan Kaisha (Nissui)
Total score 23.9 /100
Governance and strategy 4.0 /10
Ecosystems 7.9 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 8.2 /40
Governance and strategy 4.0 /10
Ecosystems 7.9 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 8.2 /40
- Pacific Seafood Group
Total score 11.5 /100
Governance and strategy 1.0 /10
Ecosystems 6.2 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 0.6 /40
Governance and strategy 1.0 /10
Ecosystems 6.2 /35
Traceability 3.8 /15
Social responsibility 0.6 /40
18 Charoen Pokphand Group
Total score 35.4 /100
Governance and strategy 6.6 /10
Ecosystems 7.4 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 18.5 /40
Governance and strategy 6.6 /10
Ecosystems 7.4 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 18.5 /40
- Dongwon Enterprise
Total score 14.3 /100
Governance and strategy 0.6 /10
Ecosystems 9.8 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 1.1 /40
Governance and strategy 0.6 /10
Ecosystems 9.8 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 1.1 /40
- Kyokuyo
Total score 11.1 /100
Governance and strategy 2.0 /10
Ecosystems 5.3 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 1.1 /40
Governance and strategy 2.0 /10
Ecosystems 5.3 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 1.1 /40
- Maruha Nichiro
Total score 20.0 /100
Governance and strategy 3.5 /10
Ecosystems 8.6 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 5.1 /40
Governance and strategy 3.5 /10
Ecosystems 8.6 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 5.1 /40
- SalMar
Total score 22.3 /100
Governance and strategy 2.5 /10
Ecosystems 10.6 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 6.3 /40
Governance and strategy 2.5 /10
Ecosystems 10.6 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 6.3 /40
- Wales Group (Sea Value & Sea Wealth)
Total score 11.5 /100
Governance and strategy 0.6 /10
Ecosystems 5.5 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 2.6 /40
Governance and strategy 0.6 /10
Ecosystems 5.5 /35
Traceability 2.8 /15
Social responsibility 2.6 /40
24 Cooke
Total score 7.3 /100
Governance and strategy 0.6 /10
Ecosystems 4.0 /35
Traceability 1.9 /15
Social responsibility 0.8 /40
Governance and strategy 0.6 /10
Ecosystems 4.0 /35
Traceability 1.9 /15
Social responsibility 0.8 /40
25 Marubeni Corporation
Total score 22.7 /100
Governance and strategy 4.4 /10
Ecosystems 12.0 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 5.4 /40
Governance and strategy 4.4 /10
Ecosystems 12.0 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 5.4 /40
- Mitsubishi Corporation
Total score 16.9 /100
Governance and strategy 3.0 /10
Ecosystems 7.7 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 5.3 /40
Governance and strategy 3.0 /10
Ecosystems 7.7 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 5.3 /40
- Red Chamber Group
Total score 5.3 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /10
Ecosystems 4.4 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 0.0 /40
Governance and strategy 0.0 /10
Ecosystems 4.4 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 0.0 /40
- Yokohama Reito (Yokorei)
Total score 10.1 /100
Governance and strategy 1.3 /10
Ecosystems 4.6 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 3.3 /40
Governance and strategy 1.3 /10
Ecosystems 4.6 /35
Traceability 0.9 /15
Social responsibility 3.3 /40
29 Bright Food Group
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /10
Ecosystems 0.0 /35
Traceability 0.0 /15
Social responsibility 0.0 /40
Governance and strategy 0.0 /10
Ecosystems 0.0 /35
Traceability 0.0 /15
Social responsibility 0.0 /40
- OUG Holdings
Total score 0.0 /100
Governance and strategy 0.0 /10
Ecosystems 0.0 /35
Traceability 0.0 /15
Social responsibility 0.0 /40
Governance and strategy 0.0 /10
Ecosystems 0.0 /35
Traceability 0.0 /15
Social responsibility 0.0 /40