Targets
Total ranking
Total score Targets Material Investment Intangible Investment Management Policy Engagement Business ModelFilter per region
Without an ambitious target, it is unlikely that the company is committed to a transition, and therefore this indicator has a high impact on the likelihood of a successful transition. Module 1, targets, therefore accounts for 20% of the total ACT Electric Utilities performance assessment score.
It assesses:
- The alignment of a company’s scope 1 and 2 generation emissions reductions targets with its 1.5°C pathway, (indicator 1.1 – weighted 12% of the performance assessment) and, to get a complete view of the company’s commitment to and credibility on emissions reductions over time, this module also assesses:
- The time horizon of targets (indicator 1.2 – weighted 4% of the performance assessment)
- Whether companies are on track to achieve its targets (indicator 1.3 – weighted 4% of the performance assessment).
Ranking overview
|
|||
|
1
Ørsted
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
6
E.ON
|
|
||
|
|||
|
8
Enel
|
|
||
|
|||
|
-
RWE
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
13
Iberdrola
|
|
||
|
14
ENGIE
|
|
||
|
-
Fortum
|
|
||
|
16
CEZ Group
|
|
||
|
|||
|
-
SSE
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
24
AGL Energy
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
30
Eletrobras
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
33
NTPC
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|