Material investment
Rank by module
Filter per region
Filter per industry
Module 2, “Material investment”, assesses actions to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions from the company’s assets and operations. Comparing the company’s trend in past and projected scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity with its 1.5°C pathway provides a good measure of its transition progress. Locked-in emissions from the company’s assets show the amount by which the company is likely to exceed its carbon budget.
Ranking overview
|
|||
|
1
SSAB
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
2
SIG
|
|
||
|
|||
|
4
Cemex
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
10
Siam Cement
|
|
||
|
|||
|
12
Salzgitter
|
|
||
|
13
Asia Cement
|
|
||
|
|||
|
15
POSCO
|
|
||
|
16
TPI Polene
|
|
||
|
17
Baowu
|
|
||
|
18
CRH
|
|
||
|
19
Voestalpine
|
|
||
|
20
Nippon Steel
|
|
||
|
21
Tata Steel
|
|
||
|
22
Shagang
|
|
||
|
23
Holcim
|
|
||
|
24
Gerdau
|
|
||
|
25
Norsk Hydro
|
|
||
|
26
Nucor
|
|
||
|
27
Arconic
|
|
||
|
28
Buzzi Unicem
|
|
||
|
29
NLMK
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
32
JFE Holdings
|
|
||
|
|||
|
34
Boral
|
|
||
|
|||
|
36
InterCement
|
|
||
|
|||
|
38
Alcoa
|
|
||
|
39
JSW Steel
|
|
||
|
|||
|
41
Shougang
|
|
||
|
|||
|
43
Shree Cement
|
|
||
|
44
Ansteel
|
|
||
|
45
UNACEM
|
|
||
|
46
Hindalco
|
|
||
|
47
Vicat
|
|
||
|
|||
|
49
Evraz
|
|
||
|
|||
|
-
Rusal
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
54
Baotou Steel
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
63
Hesteel
|
|
||
|
64
Severstal
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
68
China Steel
|
|
||
|
69
Ternium
|
|
||
|
70
SAIL
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
73
Metinvest
|
|
||
|
74
South32
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
77
BBMG
|
|
||
|
|||
|
-
CHALCO
|
|
||
|
-
CNBM
|
|
||
|
-
Cemros
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
-
Hanwa
|
|
||
|
|||
|
-
Kobelco
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|